CANCER RESEARCH & PANDORA'S BOX
7c. HIERARCHAL MISINFORMATION, DISINFORMATION & PARALOGISMS:
Mr. Steve Learmouth (Retail Health & Safety Manager)
1. The first timeline below provides the necessary background to the reply of 4th November 2008 by Cancer Research UK's Retail Health & Safety Manager to the author's recorded delivery letter of 22nd October 2008 — in continuing fulfilment of his statutory obligations under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 — wherein are "protected disclosures" — as defined in the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 — regarding the multiple, prolonged, and recidivistic breaches of the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974.
{The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 states: "In this Act a "protected disclosure" means a qualifying disclosure [... which] means any disclosure of information which, in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure, tends to show one or more of the following —
(b) that a person has failed, is failing or is likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation to which he is subject,
(d) that the health or safety of any individual has been, is being or is likely to be endangered,"}
{The Chief Executive's Health, Safety and Welfare Policy Statement states: "The Council of Cancer Research UK attaches the greatest importance to safeguarding the health, safety and welfare of all persons at work"; ... note the use of the superlative adjective in this phrase.} 6th Oct. 2008. During the course of this PDR, the Shop Assistant also draws the Area Manager's attention to the presence of the inactioned risk-assessment of the swing-door in the shop's Health & Safety File; she undertakes to address the matter. 7th Oct. 2008. Area Manager fails to action this risk-assessment; and, indeed, fails each week hereafter.{The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 state: "Every employee shall inform his employer or any other employee of that employer with specific responsibility for the health and safety of his fellow employees — (a) of any work situation which a person with the first-mentioned employee's training and instruction would reasonably consider represented a serious and immediate danger to health and safety; and (b) of any matter which a person with the first-mentioned employee's training and instruction would reasonably consider represented a shortcoming in the employer's protection arrangements for health and safety,"} 22nd Oct. 2008. Shop Assistant, continuing the fulfilment of his statutory and contractual obligations, sends confidential letter — «bristling with red flags» — by recorded delivery to the Retail Health & Safety Manager.
|
2. Please note: during the period from late-July 2006 to mid-September 2008 the workplace's volunteers included several legal minors executing the Duke of Edinburgh Award, two adults with severely compromised immune systems, several unemployed adults on temporary «work experience», one adult with Asperger's syndrome, and several senior citizens — including two with greatly decreased mobility.
3. The Retail Health & Safety Manager's reply to the Shop Assistant's recorded delivery letter of 22nd October.
Cancer Research UK
[Recipient's address.] |
4. Here follows a deconstruction of the above «reply». [...]
5. This second timeline provides the necessary background to the Retail Health & Safety Manager's letter of 9th December 2008.
5th Nov. 2008. Safety Auditor (Mr. Jim Holyhead), at the conclusion of a formal compliance audit — partially conducted in the presence of an Area Relief Manager (Ms. Logan), formerly Shop Manager — gives a «score» of 44/51 [see extract of Health and Safety Audit 2008/2009 ("Area Manager: T. McIlhoney")]. |
6. The Retail Health & Safety Manager's letter of the 9th December. [... ...]
[Document in progress.]
________________________________________________________________________________
1. ACCESS & EGRESS : 4pp.
2. ELECTRICAL & FIRE SAFETY : 4pp.
3. DIVERSE SAFETY : 10pp.
4. DATA PROTECTION & HUMAN RIGHTS : 6pp.
5. VOLUNTEER CARE : 7pp.
6. HIERARCHAL BREACHES OF CONFIDENTIALITY : 11pp.
7. HIERARCHAL MISINFORMATION, DISINFORMATION & PARALOGISMS: Introduction : 12pp.
[Deconstructions — in progress (*) or in preparation.]
7a. Ms. T. McIlhoney (Area Manager; & Line-Manager, from 11th August 2007 to 1st December 2008) : 6pp.* |
8. PROFLIGACY : 13pp.; document in progress.
________________________________________________________________________________
[Notes]
1. Antiphrase: phrase conveying the opposite meaning to the one intended literally. Disinformation: falsehood(s) by omission. Duty: moral or legal obligation. Dysfunctional literacy: impaired comprehension skills; unwitting misuse of language. Ensure: make safe or sure; make sure to happen; secure. Functional illiteracy: inadequate reading and writing skills for ordinary practical needs. Investigation: searching inquiry for ascertaining (relevant) facts in context; detailed or careful examination. Misfeasance: inadequate or poor performance of a contractual duty. Misinformation: falsehood(s). Nonfeasance: complete failure to perform a contractual duty. Paralogism: illogical reasoning, the illogicality of which the reasoner in question is unware of. Platitude: trite or banal statement, especially one expressed as if it were significant and original. Remedial: designed or intended to correct or improve a deficiency in a specific attribute. Root cause: initiating cause of a causal chain which leads to an outcome or effect of importance. Systematic: marked by regularity. Systemic weakness: one that is judged to be a fundamental problem that requires corrective action through administrative, regulatory, legislative, or policy change.
2. CR-UK's Council of Trustees (2007-2010): Mr. David Newbigging (Chairman), Dr. Melanie Lee (Deputy Chairman), Professor Colin Bird, Professor Sir Kenneth Calman, Dr. Philip Campbell, Sir James Crosby, Ms. Liz Hewitt, Mr. Roger Matthews, Dame Bridget Ogilvie, Dr. Keith Palmer, Ms. Leah Sowden, Professor Jeffrey Tobias.
Dr. R. Peters' Home Page.
[July 2010]